There was an article I was going to share... But then I though "Why give into the hype?"
So...I won't be sharing this article. Don't go looking for it either. Because it's "sour grapes" for its droll, dry disgusting format of inappropriately criticizing the successful.
A writer for the Huffington Post who would inexplicable criticize something she admits to never reading, ridiculing adults for reading it, and pretending she is the high queen judge of authorship should (within my own opinion) see some form of punishment.
The slander from Lynn Shepherd was not just dry, but uneducated. Her ploy was to downplay the work she was writing about, which I must add she has "never read" and thus has mentioned that she cannot say whether it was "good, bad or indifferent."
So why am I not just sending you the article itself?
Because this slander is just to gain hype. That's all. She attacked JK Rowling, your favorite writer of Harry Potter, and mine, out of spite for successful writers. Her articles reads at first as a wet slap in the face for readers and the writer, who are baffled that she can make such claims without having read the books or watched the movies. Then it goes on to explain that JK Rowling should "stop writing" that she should "back down" for other writers to succeed.
I don't see how JK Rowling backing down from her work would make my work or hers any more successful.
If you still want to read it, find it on the Huffington Post. The only reason I am talking about it is because the reason people make these kinds of articles is because of hype, and she is getting LOTS OF IT. So I implore you...
I'm just kidding, I'm not a troll.
Seriously though, it is a problem when a wonderful writer can be slanderized without any backing.
Even people who do not like Rowling's work or her person can agree that this article is downright cruel.
So...I won't be sharing this article. Don't go looking for it either. Because it's "sour grapes" for its droll, dry disgusting format of inappropriately criticizing the successful.
A writer for the Huffington Post who would inexplicable criticize something she admits to never reading, ridiculing adults for reading it, and pretending she is the high queen judge of authorship should (within my own opinion) see some form of punishment.
The slander from Lynn Shepherd was not just dry, but uneducated. Her ploy was to downplay the work she was writing about, which I must add she has "never read" and thus has mentioned that she cannot say whether it was "good, bad or indifferent."
So why am I not just sending you the article itself?
Because this slander is just to gain hype. That's all. She attacked JK Rowling, your favorite writer of Harry Potter, and mine, out of spite for successful writers. Her articles reads at first as a wet slap in the face for readers and the writer, who are baffled that she can make such claims without having read the books or watched the movies. Then it goes on to explain that JK Rowling should "stop writing" that she should "back down" for other writers to succeed.
I don't see how JK Rowling backing down from her work would make my work or hers any more successful.
If you still want to read it, find it on the Huffington Post. The only reason I am talking about it is because the reason people make these kinds of articles is because of hype, and she is getting LOTS OF IT. So I implore you...
1) Don't look it up. Don't read it.
2) Do not like.
3) Do not share
4) Do not open the links to Lynn Shepherd's work.
I'm just kidding, I'm not a troll.
Seriously though, it is a problem when a wonderful writer can be slanderized without any backing.
Even people who do not like Rowling's work or her person can agree that this article is downright cruel.
No comments:
Post a Comment